Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Douglas Bullis's avatar

This one is admirably described with plenty of precise sensory details — always a plus, and you are really good at. The louche appearance of the man fits the bottom-dwelling alcoholic well. There are a couple of typos, “it’s” should be “its” in para 1and the “through” at the bottom should be “threw”.

But the plot line is so implausible it overwhelms the descripive precision. Why does the unnamed clerk need a basball bat to stop a would-be robber who is both drunk and frail? One could disarm the man by grasping his wrist and bending his palm toward his elbow (try it, it’s a well known defense maneuver). A good writer resorts to violence only when there is no smarter solution. Violence is like swearing — the effort of a weak mind to express itself strongly.

The story really falls apart with the implausible scene of a store owner burning his own store down with vodka to cover up a non-crime. (A piquant idea if it was a liquor store!) But torching one’s own store to cover up a misbegotten robbery doesn’t pass the smell test of “Why?”

And a FAR more appealing and realistic ending would be for the store owner to take the drunk outside and call for medical help. The man is obviously sick and needs help, not hurt. A good-writer’s ending would be for the man to look at the clerk as he is loaded into the ambulance and saying, “You saw that I needed help and didn’t know how to got it.”

Solving a problem with smart compassion beats stupid use of pain every time — and shows the writer knows how to reveal the underlying issues not made obvious in the narrative itself.

Douglas Bullis's avatar

Find a new profession that doen’t promote violence. Your writing is OK but subject stinks.

1 more comment...

No posts

Ready for more?